Money for Bali bombing came from bin Laden, witnesses say

Khabar Southeast Asia
 
Two former associates of alleged Bali bomb maker Umar Patek testified that funds from al-Qaeda paid for the Mitsubishi used in the lethal 2002 attack.
Osama bin Laden sent as much as $30,000 to the militants who carried out the 2002 Bali bombing, witnesses in the trial of terror suspect Umar Patek testified. The funds, they said, covered numerous expenses incurred by the bombers
“I actually did not know where the money came from but [convicted bomber] Mukhlas told me that it was received gradually from Osama,” Mohammad Ikhsan, also known as Idris, told the West Jakarta District Court on Monday (March 26th).
The al-Qaeda funds, he added, went towards the purchase of a Mitsubishi L300, used as a car bomb outside a crowded nightclub in Bali’s Kuta resort.
“Apart from that, the funding was also used to purchase the material for manufacturing bombs, two motorbikes, renting a house, and also the living costs for members of the Bali bomb terrorist network,” Idris said.
His testimony echoes the one given by a fellow witness, Ali Imron, who is the younger brother of Mukhlas. Imron told the court Thursday that Mukhlas had received the money personally from the al-Qaeda leader.
“In 2001, while my brother was in Afghanistan, he met Osama bin Laden and carried back $30,000 in order to carry out amaliah jihad in Southeast Asia,” said Imron, who received a life sentence in 2003 for his role in the plot. Mukhlas—also known as Ali Ghufron—and another brother of Imron’s, Amrozi, were executed in January 2003.
Much of the focus in the Patek trial has been on whether the defendant, who has admitted to mixing the bombs used in the Bali attack, was culpable for how they were used. Patek, a 42-year-old former operative with the Jemaah Islamiyah extremist network, has denied that he knew the details concerning the bomb plot.
He faces six charges, including premeditated murder, in connection with the Bali bombings and attacks carried out against six Jakarta churches on Christmas Eve in 2000, as well as identification fraud and illegal possession of firearms and explosives. Having fled the country in 2003, he was apprehended in January 2011 in Pakistan and sent back to Indonesia to face justice.
If convicted, he could face the death penalty.
Key witnesses have corroborated charges that he mixed the deadly chemical cocktails that were detonated in the attacks. On Monday, Idris said that on one occasion when he came to deliver food to the house where the bombers were staying, he saw Patek mixing the explosive materials.
“I actually only saw it for a second and was not sure what kind of material that was mixed by Patek because I did not see the substance that was mixed. However I did see that the explosive material, which was sent from Lamongan [in East Java], had been opened,” Idris said.
On Thursday, Imron said Patek appeared to express hesitation after a mishap that occurred as the group moved a filing cabinet containing the lethal stew.
“Amrozi, who was joking around or actually annoyed, dragged the filing cabinet instead of lifting it up,” he said. “It caused explosive materials, which were scattered on the floor, to rub against each other and cause an explosion inside the house.”
After the incident, Imron said, Patek interrupted the others and said “perhaps it is a sign we must not bomb.”

OIC to militant group: who gave you the right to speak for Islam?

Khabar South East Asia


The Islamic Defenders Front (FPI), a hardline group frequently accused of intimidation and violence, came under sharp criticism from Organisation of Islamic Co-operation Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu during his recent visit to Jakarta.
“From where did they get the license to do such things?” Ihsanoglu asked as he spoke to reporters February 20th at the Presidential Office. “When somebody says ‘I am doing this in the name of Islam’, we have to question who gave them the license to speak on behalf of Islam.”
Islam has a standard in the form of the Holy Qur’an and Sunnah (traditions of the Prophet Muhammad), said the official, who was in Indonesia last month for the inaugural meeting of OIC’s newly-established Independent Permanent Human Rights Commission.
Members of the body held talks with President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who has been vocal in calling for moderation and religious tolerance.
Interpretation should be made by the proper religious authorities and “it should be in context”, The Jakarta Post quoted Ihsanoglu as saying. The FPI garnered headlines by deputising itself as a moral police squad, with mobs of hooded men shouting in Arabic as they attack and vandalise bars, nightclubs, stores selling alcohol, and food vendors that stay open during Ramadan.
Such incidents have angered many in Indonesia who see the group as threatening the country’s distinctive blend of Islam and democracy. In mid-February, hundreds of protesters rallied in Jakarta and other cities to denounce the FPI’s actions.
Prominent Islamic authorities in Indonesia have also criticised the FPI, saying Islam does not condone vigilante behaviour. Imdadun Rahmat, Deputy Secretary General of Nahdlatul Ulama, says the group has been misusing Islam by conducting acts of violence in order to force its point of view and achieve its objectives.
“Everybody has the right to use Islam in their organisation’s name as long as their actions accord with Islamic values and vision, without forcing their point of view on other people,” he said.
Amid mounting public pressure, the FPI says it is changing its ways.
Awid Masuri, the group’s deputy secretary general, acknowledges that the FPI for many years has utilised violent means in order to realise its goals, but he says this approach is being scrapped.
“We have been trying to change our approach to society to enforce the law by having a better communication with people,” he said. “Although we have changed our paradigm to a more peaceful approach, the mass media is still creating a negative image about us.”
That argument didn’t convince Imdadun, who said the group is just using the media as a scapegoat in order to deflect attention from its behaviour. “It is a fact that they have been using violence to achieve their objective. Everybody knows and sees it! Why would they pin the blame on the media exposure?” he said.
“Islam is a peaceful religion,” Imdadun added.
Muhammad Guntur Romli, a pluralist activist, told Khabar Southeast East Asia that laws are in place, which could be used to restrain FPI vigilantes.
“Indonesia actually has several legal instruments for curbing anarchist organisations such as the FPI — either Indonesian Criminal Code or Law Number 8 of 1985 on Mass Organisation,” he said.
But Mohammed Mahfud MD, the chief of Indonesia’s Constitutional Court, said more specific regulations need to be in place.
“Although Indonesia has legal instruments regarding mass organisation, it does not regulate them properly. Therefore the government cannot disband any mass organisation, because it will be against democratic values,” he said. “It needs to be understood that the state cannot disband any mass organisation without a proper regulation.”
Interreligious Council (IRC) Chairman Din Syamsuddin says mass organisations have the right to exist in the country as long as they do not resort to violence.
“I’m not talking about certain groups, but in general they all have the right to exist, the right to speak up. However, they can only do that under one condition: none of them should resort to violence,” Din, who is also the chairman of the Muhammadiyah, the country’s second largest Islamic organisation, said in comments quoted by aThe Jakarta Post.

Patek lawyers: client didn’t know what bombs were for

Khabar Southeast Asia

Patek lawyers: client didn’t know what bombs were for

Defense contends that Umar Patek was not part of the Bali terror plot, although he admits to manufacturing the explosives used.

Closeted away in a rented flat, he allegedly spent weeks manufacturing a massive bomb that was used in the 2002 Bali attacks. But Umar Patek and his lawyers say no one can prove he actually knew what his handiwork was going to be used for.

“Patek was invited by Imam Samudra [to mix the explosives] and he only took part in constructing the bombs. But actually Patek was not involved in the planning or its implementation,” attorney Asludin Hatjani told reporters outside the court.

Samudra, a university-educated computer expert described by police as the “field commander” of the Bali terrorists, was convicted in 2003 and executed by firing squad in November 2008 along with two accomplices, Amrozi bin Nurhasyim and Ali Ghufron.

Although Patek manufactured bombs at their bidding, that doesn’t prove he was involved in the plot, his defense lawyers argue. Therefore they say, he should not be charged with premeditated murder – one of six counts brought against him in his indictment.

“There is no legal argument that could prove the defendant deliberately participated in the plan to take lives,” another lawyer, who goes only by the name Ainal, told the court.

Prosecutors in the case, however, say Patek was an integral part of the conspiracy, even if he neither transported the bombs to the attack site, nor helped set them off.

“If a group of people co-operate to plan and conduct a crime of killings, it doesn’t matter who finishes the job. They are all involved,” prosecutor Bambang Suharyadi said.

Over 200 people died when the 700kg bomb, hidden in a Mitsubishi van, exploded outside the popular Sari Club on Kuta Beach. Most victims were young foreigners, though the blast also killed locals who worked in the area or were just passing by.

Patek’s defense team has also argued that terrorism laws adopted by Indonesia in 2003 can’t be applied to earlier cases, including the Bali bombing. His lawyers contest the claim that Patek participated in a jihadist training camp in the province of Aceh.

“He was at the site, but was only there to attend a wedding,” Hasludin said.

The 45-year-old Patek could be sentenced to death if convicted, and prosecutors have said they will push for the maximum penalty. He is a “dangerous figure wanted not only in Indonesia but also in other countries such as the Philippines. He has caused the deaths of many,” Bambang said.

Some analysts argue, however, that executing Patek would hinder rather than help the effort to root out violent extremism.

“It is not that I defend Patek, but it needs to be understood that he is a goldmine of information where we can always get more information about terrorist networks, particularly in South East Asia,” said Noor Huda Ismail, a Jakarta-based analyst at the Institute of International Peace Building.

According to Huda, Patek could play a role in neutralising the emergence of new radical networks, in part because of his knowledge concerning recent developments such as the Aceh camp and its leader Dulmatin, killed by police in March 2010.

There would be precedents for handing down a lighter sentence if Patek renounces extremism. In 2003, judges spared the life of convicted Bali bomber Ali Imron, who had expressed repentance over his actions and described them as misguided.

“Our capabilities as Indonesians are something to be proud of, but they were used for a wrong purpose,” said Imron, who testified he received training in Afghanistan on how to make bombs.

“In my heart, I regret this. I want to apologise to the victims’ families in Indonesia and to foreign families.”

Patek, however, has yet to signal remorse over the carnage in Bali. In October 2011, he appeared emotionless as he accompanied police on a re-enactment of the devastating attack.

He is the top remaining suspect in the Bali night clubs bombing, which focused worldwide attention on the al-Qaeda-linked group Jemaah Islamiyah and its goal of creating a pan-Islamic theocracy across Southeast Asia.

My Jakarta: Hira Juwita Prabukusumo, Microfinance Advocate

The Jakarta Globe

My Jakarta: Hira Juwita Prabukusumo, Microfinance Advocate

‘I Want to Show People That I Can Stand On My Own Two Feet’

Hira Juwita Prabukusumo, the youngest daughter of Sultan Hamengkubuwono X’s younger brother Haryo Prabukusumo, is part of the royal family but she isn’t content just living a privileged life filled luxury. She has chosen to work and make her own way in the world.

Hira recently graduated from University of Gadjah Mada’s School of Architecture, and is working in Jakarta at Sampoerna Microfinance’s Business Development Division, where she finds fulfillment by helping people realize their dreams of owning a business and making a better future for themselves.

Why did you choose to get into microfinance?

I really love my job because although I am working in banking, there is an emphasis on society, especially the less fortunate people in Indonesia.

My job is not about helping the rich become richer but helping the less fortunate get out of from poverty in a creative yet independent way.

As soon as I graduated from university and I saw this job opportunity, I applied for it. Now people understand that microfinance is actually an excellent way to help people to get out of poverty in a creative community-based way using local commodities. And also, microbusinesses don’t feel the impact of the global financial crisis.

However, in order to keep helping people, we can’t just give them money because they might not be using it properly. We offer them a soft loan, which they have to eventually pay back. This way it encourages the owners to work hard to develop their business.

In addition to all of that, microfinance largely helps women and children, who tend to be the victim of domestic violence when a poor family is facing a financial problem.

Coming from Yogyakarta, how do you like Jakarta?

Jakarta is the capital city, the center of activity and business, it is a place where most decisions and policies are made. If I have an idea and I want it to be implemented on the regional level, I think I have to work in Jakarta because if my idea is accepted, it can be spread throughout the nation from here. If I were working in the regional level and I had an idea, it would likely stay in one place.

As a member of the royal family, why didn’t you take it easy or use your family connections?

I have been asked this question and similar ones over and over again. Even worse, is when people say things such as ‘Of course, you can study in UGM because you are part of the royal family.’ Many people only look at my background, not at me as an individual. Therefore, I want to show people that I can stand on my own two feet. I want to show people that I have developed my own skills and abilities.

So I left Yogyakarta and looked for a job at a place where none of my family members were also working.

Surprisingly, my boss told me that I was doing a good job and I was promoted after just three months at Sampoerna. I was really glad.

How important is it to you to be part of the royal family?

Even though I want people to see and know me as an individual, I would say that royal family member status is still important to me because it is part of my culture and I do not want to dismiss it.

What do you think about Jakarta?

Jakarta is such an unorganized city especially in terms of transportation infrastructure and also security.

Last August, I saw a gunman in the middle of a traffic jam one afternoon near the Senopati area. The gunman was mad at a driver and he was firing his gun into the sky as a form of intimidation. Can you believe it happened in the late afternoon when the sun was still out and in the middle of traffic? It was so shocking.

Other than safety concerns, I think people’s skills are not really appreciated here and they don’t get a fair salary even the living cost in Jakarta is so high.

However, there is always two sides of a coin. Although Jakarta is such an unorganized city, it is also a great place for people to build their careers and increase their knowledge because everyone is here. You can meet all kinds of people with different kinds of knowledge, backgrounds and opportunities to offer.

Are you interested in politics like many of the other members of the royal family?

No! Not at all! Politics is cruel. It is full of intrigue and you will never know who your friends are or who your enemies are. I have seen it and I am not interested. It would be better for me to create something real which has a positive impact for people, especially the less fortunate ones, such as establishing a business and hiring people so that they can earn a living. I see that politics is only about money. I do not want to be so selfish and work to only benefit myself.

Hira Juwita Prabukusumo was talking to Elisabeth Oktofani.

How Positive Coverage Can Be Bought: An Insider Tells of Dirty Journalists

The Jakarta Globe


Danu Pratama (not his real name) has worked as a journalist for nearly seven years, covering beats ranging from technology and politics to human rights and legal issues.

During that time he has also taken bribes from sources and others to “play up issues in the media,” essentially presenting deliberately biased or inaccurate news stories to benefit those paying him.

“We can play up any issue in the media, especially political, legal and economic issues, because politicians, law enforcement officials and businessmen are willing to spend a lot of money to attack their rivals through the media and make them look bad,” Danu told the Jakarta Globe on Thursday.

He said his demands for bribes ranged from Rp 7.5 million ($830) into the hundreds of millions, depending on the urgency of the issue, who the source was and whether they wanted an issue manipulated in print, broadcast or online media — or all three.

“I never play up an issue alone, because then it’d become obvious,” he went on. “I usually work with a team of five other journalists, where I act as the coordinator and make the deal with the source. I assure you that even the so-called cleanest media outlets have journalists who have taken part in this ‘mafia’ practice.”

As shocking as Danu’s revelation is, senior media figures say this culture of strings-attached reporting is the norm in Indonesia, fueled by a liberal official stance on bribery and a largely underpaid press corps.

“Government institutions and companies often allocate a portion of their budget to a media development fund that provides journalists with so-called transportation money,” said Nezar Patria, chairman of the Alliance of Independent Journalists (AJI).

“They maintain a list of journalists covering their beats, whom they usually give anywhere from Rp 250,000 to Rp 1 million each. Unfortunately, this money is often accepted by journalists who work for less-than-credible media outlets that don’t pay them well.”

Nezar said AJI and the Press Council had for the past 15 years been campaigning against the practice of journalists taking bribes. “Indonesian journalists and the media have taken part in the fight because they understand the importance of not losing our sense of objectivity when reporting a story,” he said.

“That commitment can be seen in every media outlet, which all state that journalists may not receive any gifts or money.”

He added that this value was clearly enshrined in the journalistic code of conduct.

“Other than compromising a journalist’s objectivity, receiving a gift or a bribe will harm the wider profession because it needs to be understood that journalists are agents of information between the state and public,” he said. “A journalist must convey only the truth because society has a right to know the truth.”

Agus Sudibyo, a member of the Press Council, agreed.

“But we can’t accuse any journalists of doing this unless we have evidence, such as phone recordings,” he said.

“If the Press Council does receive evidence that a journalist has taken a bribe or a gift, we will notify the media outlet or their journalists’ association.”

Let’s Go Past ‘Vain’ Facebook: Official

The Jakarta Globe


Indonesia may have the highest number of Facebook users in Asia, but the Internet needs to be used for more than just cheap sensation and navel-gazing, an official said on Wednesday.

There were 38.6 million Facebook users in the country as of last December, according to the Ministry of Communication and Information Technology. It was just shy of the 39.7 million people it said had access to the Internet.

More recent statistics from independent analysts put the country’s current Facebook population at 40.8 million.

Ministry official Freddy Tulung said that although the high figure was “a positive thing,” Internet use in the country needed to be directed toward more substantial purposes.

“Are we willing to just keep using Facebook as a platform for cheap thrills and narcissism?” he said. “We want people to make much broader use of the Internet, which is about more than just chatting.”

In addition to having the second-biggest Facebook population on the planet, behind only the United States, Indonesia is also the No. 3 source for all tweets on Twitter, after the United States and Brazil.

A Nielsen report earlier this year found that 48 percent of the country’s Internet users accessed the Web through their cellphones, with almost 90 percent of tweets sent from mobile devices.

A business lobby, however, said more needed to be done to clear up the 3G cellular spectrum to improve mobile Internet access and services.

Mas Wigrantoro Roes Setiadi, from the Indonesian Telematics Community, urged the ministry to pass a long-awaited regulation on tidying up the 3G spectrum.

The regulation would require Telkomsel, the country’s biggest cellular operator, to shift its spectrum to line up more neatly with other operators.

The ministry has given Telkomsel until the end of the year to comply.

Greenpeace Cries Foul as Eviction Papers Are Served

The Jakarta Globe


Environmental group Greenpeace has lashed out at the Jakarta administration’s decision to seal off its office for zoning violations, calling the move just the latest attack in a corporate-backed smear campaign against the organization.

Greenpeace Southeast Asia media campaigner Hikmat Soeriatanuwijaya said the group had been unfairly targeted.

“The continued attacks against Greenpeace started when we launched our global campaign against Asia Pulp and Paper by exposing evidence of APP forest destruction in early June this year,” he said.

He declined, however, to say who Greenpeace believed was behind the smear campaign.

“Although we know who it is, we don’t want to mention the particular company or party because we don’t have a capacity to investigate it,” Hikmat said.

The statements came as the Jakarta Building Control and Monitoring Office (P2B) said it had served notice to Greenpeace on Wednesday about the closure and would proceed with sealing off its office on Jalan Kemang Utara in South Jakarta next Monday.

Agus Supriyono, P2B’s head of enforcement, said the office had been built in an area designated for residential buildings only.

“Like any other building that violates regulations, we will have to seal off this building,” he said.

“We will only unseal it once the building owners have restored it as a residential property. So that means that come Monday, Greenpeace must stop all activities at its office.”

Agus denied that his office had been pressured by outside parties to move against Greenpeace, calling the matter a simple zoning issue. He added that an office building next to the Greenpeace office would also be sealed off.

However, several other office and commercial buildings on the same street have been allowed to operate as usual.

“We don’t have a problem with Greenpeace. We’re just doing our job, which is to enforce zoning regulations and take measures against violating buildings,” Agus said.

“If Greenpeace wants to relocate its offices, they’re welcome to do so, just as long as they do so in an area where it’s permissible.”

Widyo Dwiyono, head of the South Jakarta P2B office, echoed the point that the entire Kemang area was designated as a residential zone, making it imperative that Greenpeace move.

Kemang is also home to scores of restaurants, bars, nightclubs and shops, very few of which have ever been sealed off or cited for zoning violations.

Hikmat said Greenpeace found it humorous how its “persecutor” kept coming up with different ways of attacking the organization, including past allegations that it was funded by lottery money and that it was intent on stalling Indonesian economic development by attacking the country’s palm oil industry.

“We’re not against the palm oil industry, nor do we want to stop Indonesian economic development,” he said. “All we are asking for is responsible industrial practices by implementing sustainable industrial development rather than destroying and exploiting the rainforest.

“It needs to be understood that Greenpeace’s campaigns focus on saving the Indonesian rainforest, hence we continue to urge all companies to save the rainforest through sustainable industrial development.”

Hikmat added that Greenpeace was aware it faced opposition to its work, but said attacks and pressure would not stop it from campaigning for better environmental stewardship.

“We just hope that the media and society don’t get the wrong idea about our mission in Indonesia because we just want to save the Indonesian rainforest,” he said.

Last month, a Greenpeace UK forest campaigner was deported from Indonesia for reasons that were never made clear. That incident took place less than a week after the Greenpeace UK director was denied entry into the country despite arriving with a valid visa.

Nur Hidayati, head of Greenpeace Indonesia, said at the time that the group was “coming under attack in Indonesia because of our work to stop deforestation in the country.”

Lawmakers and religious leaders have publicly questioned the source of the group’s funding, while hard-line groups have claimed it is working in the country illegally because it is not registered with the Jakarta administration.

Critics of Greenpeace have also accused it of targeting APP while ignoring foreign companies that operate in Indonesia. APP, though, is foreign, being based in Singapore.

Kemang Bar Faces Questions After Fatal Stabbing of Youth

The Jakarta Globe
 

Elisabeth Oktofani, Ismira Lutfia & Zaky Paws

Following the fatal stabbing of a high school student at a nightspot in South Jakarta’s trendy Kemang area, a children’s rights activist demanded that the nightclub be held responsible and called on the victim’s school to evaluate its teaching practices.

Arist Merdeka Sirait, the chairman of the National Commission for Child Protection (Komnas Anak), said on Sunday that the owners of SHY Rooftop should have had rules in place to keep out people under the age of 18.

“The nightclub owners should be held responsible for the stabbing of the Pangudi Luhur high school student because they didn’t enforce this law,” he said.

Arist said Pangudi Luhur students had a reputation for getting involved in brawls, indicating there was a need to evaluate the school’s teaching practices.

“As an educational institute, the school has to focus not only on its students’ academic achievements, but on molding their behavior,” he said.

However, whether the 17-year-old victim, Raafi Aga Winasya Benjamin, should have been allowed into SHY Rooftop may not be a clear-cut issue.

In Jakarta, the minimum age to be allowed into a nightclub is 17, and there is no age limit to enter restaurants.

Arie Budiman, the head of Jakarta’s Tourism and Culture Office, told the Jakarta Globe on Sunday that the permit given to the establishment classified it as a restaurant, bar and live music venue, meaning there is no restriction on who is allowed to enter.

He said the presence of a bar serving alcoholic beverages was part of the restaurant and there was a generally enforced minimum age limit of 17 to consume alcohol.

Yuan Kusuma, who manages several venues that operate nightclubs after 10 p.m., said the policy of keeping out younger patrons was in the hands of managers.

“You need to be 21 or over to get into one of my places,” he told the Globe. “However, before 10 p.m., anyone can dine at the restaurant and we check IDs before letting people in.

“I don’t know about other venues, but we drew up this policy ourselves and stick to provincial by-laws,” Yuan added.

He said that apart from checking IDs, his staff also frisk patrons and inspect the contents of their bags to check for weapons.

However, he admitted that the 21-and-over rule was difficult to enforce with women.

“Makeup can make a woman look older than she is,” Yuan said, adding that the rule was also flexibly enforced for women in a bid to drive up business.

“The more sugar there is, the more ants there are,” he said.

South Jakarta Police Sr. Comr. Imam Sugianto said officers were questioning 12 witnesses as part of its investigation into the circumstances behind the stabbing, which took place early on Saturday morning .

“The witnesses include patrons, friends of the victim, security guards and management personnel at the venue,” he said on Sunday.

Police are also studying closed circuit TV footage from the night. “We’re still analyzing the footage, hopefully it will give us more leads,” Imam said.

Raafi and about 20 friends arrived at SHY Rooftop at 11 p.m. on Friday for a birthday celebration. “They had drinks, but did not get drunk,” Imam said.

He added that at around 2 a.m. on Saturday, Raafi got into an argument with six other patrons at the venue.

“We’re still not sure whether Raafi or his friends knew the people he was arguing with,” Imam said.

The argument escalated into a fight and Raafi was stabbed in the stomach, presumably with a knife. Imam said that at about 3 a.m., Raafi’s friends took him to a hospital in Pasar Minggu, but he died from blood loss.

His body was taken to Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital for an autopsy.

“We’re still waiting on the official results,” Imam said, adding that police were also still searching for the murder weapon.

He criticized the management of SHY Rooftop for not notifying police of the incident immediately and said that by the time officers arrived, the scene of the crime had been cleaned.

“They had mopped up the blood and rolled up the carpet,” Imam said. “They have destroyed evidence, which is a crime.”

“They did not file a police report,” he added. “We only learned of the stabbing after being informed by Raafi’s friends.”

Imam said police would distribute a letter to the managers of all nightspots and would add a new clause to the permits of new nightspots.

“We’ll follow up on getting a clause in the permits of existing venues obliging them to notify police of such incidents,” he said.

Shy Rooftop Wajib Tanggung Jawab

Beritasatu.com


Shy Rooftop seharusnya membuat peraturan yang ketat. Anak dibawah usia 18 tahun tidak dapat masuk ke tempat hiburan malam.

Pemilik Shy Rooftop Kemang wajib bertanggung jawab atas kasus penusukan siswa SMA Pangudi Luhur Raafi Aga Winasya Benjamin (17) hingga tewas. Sementara SMA Pangudi Luhur perlu melakukan evaluasi sistem belajar mengajar.

Arist Merdeka Sirait, Ketua Komisi Nasional Perlindungan Anak, mengatakan bahwa anak dibawah usia 18 tahun tidak boleh masuk ke tempat hiburan malam.

“Selain harus memahami sebuah tempat hiburan malam tidak boleh memekerjakan anak dibawah usia 18 tahun sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan, tempat hiburan malam juga harus melarang anak dibawah usia 18 tahun untuk masuk ke tempat seperti itu dengan peraturan yang ketat,” kata Arist, kepada beritasatu.com, hari ini.

“Oleh karena itu, dalam kasus penusukan siswa SMA Pangudi Luhur tersebut pemilik kafe wajib untuk bertanggungjawab karena tidak adanya peraturan yang ketat tersebut,” imbuh dia.

Arist juga mengungkapkan selama ini SMA Pangudi Luhur memang terkenal sebagai sekolah yang sering berantem sehingga pihak sekolah wajib untuk mengevaluasi dirinya.

“SMA Pangudi Luhur kiranya perlu untuk dievaluasi kembali. Sebagai lembaga pendidikan, SMA Pangudi Luhur seharusnya tidak hanya mengedepankan prestasi akademiknya semata tetapi juga memperhatikan perilaku siswa,” tandas Arist.

Ekstremisme Islam Muncul Karena Hukum Tidak Ditegakkan

Beritasatu.com


“Indonesia saat ini sedang dalam keadaan terpuruk karena hukum tidak dijalankan sebagaimana mestinya dan rakyat tidak dilatih untuk berperilaku disiplin,” kata Ali.

Lemahnya penegakan hukum telah mengikis kedisiplinan rakyat Indonesia, dan situlah berkembang kelompok-kelompok ekstremis, demikian dikatakan Ali Mustafa Yaqub, Imam Besar Masjid Istiqlal, di Jakarta, hari ini.

“Indonesia saat ini sedang dalam keadaan terpuruk karena hukum tidak dijalankan sebagaimana mestinya dan rakyat tidak dilatih untuk berperilaku disiplin,” kata Ali.

Sesungguhnya toleransi antar umat beragama di Indonesia sudah cukup bagus namun belum ideal, karena banyak oknum yang melakukan hal-hal yang dapat menyebabkan munculnya pergesekan antar umat beragama.

“Munculnya oknum-oknum yang melakukan hal-hal yang dapat menyebabkan adanya pergesekan antar umat beragama karena hukum tidak dijalankan dengan benar, ada orang salah namun tidak hukum. Padahal peraturan sudah ada namun pelaksanaanya belum dilaksanakan dengan benar,” kata Ali.

Selain itu, Ali menuturkan bahwa munculnya kaum ekstrimis di kalangan Islam disebabkan karena oknum umat Islam tersebut belum mempelajari Islam secara utuh.

“Ada ajaran Islam yang mengajarkan bagaimana menghadapi situasi perang dan bagaimana menghadapi situasi damai. Kalau yang diambil hanya ayat tentang perang saja maka dapat menyebabkan seseorang menjadi ekstrimis,” jelasnya.

“Sehingga umat Islam harus mempelajari Islam secara utuh dan jangan mempelajari Islam sepotong-sepotong saja. Dan ini kembali pada peran serta ulama juga,” kata Ali.