Activists said on Monday that violence against women still dominated reports on women’s issues in the print media and that other angles and themes needed to be explored. 

The state-sanctioned National Commission on Violence Against Women (Komnas Perempuan) said its findings came from a survey of reports on women’s issues published by eight national print media in 2010, including the Jakarta Globe. 

The survey showed that from the 1,278 articles on women’s issues covered in those media that year, 82.95 percent were focused on violence against women. The majority of the rest covered gender discrimination, female criminals and morality issues. 

Komnas Perempuan’s Andy Yentriyani said at a discussion on Monday that the media should pay more attention to the frequently negative portrayal of women’s morality, even in stories where a woman is the victim of a sexual assault. 

“The presumption of innocence is often neglected by the media, especially media reports on pornography, where the moral issue, rather than the sexual violence, is being brought forward,” she said. 

TV presenters Cut Tari and Luna Maya both came under intense media scrutiny last year after being implicated in the Nazril “Ariel” Irham sex video scandal. Both women were publicly denounced by some religious groups for immoral behavior. 

Komnas Perempuan commissioner Arimbi Heroeputri said that while 83 percent of reports on women’s issues actually met the journalistic code of ethics, including in not naming victims of certain crimes, only half met both the journalistic code of ethics and Komnas Perempuan’s own code of victim’s rights. 

Nunung Qomariyah, another commissioner, called on the media to become an agent of change and help spread a better understanding of the issues women face in society. 

“The media also has a function to influence, create and change society’s point of view … on women’s issues, to have a better understanding in the society,” Nunung said. 

Another commissioner, Neng Dara Affifah, said the press council and other journalistic organizations must closely monitor the implementation of the code of ethics in media reports. 

“In order to implement the code of conduct in media reports on violence against women, media workers and women activists need to discuss and establish an appropriate code of conduct,” Neng said. 

Neng said that in reporting on violence against women, the presumption of innocence, especially for the victims, should also be respected, especially when concerning a public figure.

The government is set to begin issuing the much-discussed electronic identification cards in September, an official said on Sunday. 

Raydonnyzar Moenek, a spokesman with the Ministry of Home Affairs, told the Jakarta Globe that the government would begin handing out the new cards, also known as E-KTPs, in 197 districts, mostly in Java and Bali. 

The E-KTP is being hailed by the government as a step forward that will simplify bureaucratic processes and improve national security by being tougher to forge. 

The new smart cards will be equipped with an electronic chip that will contain more data than previously recorded, such as information on birth, land ownership and tax status. 

They will also contain a biometric fingerprint and the holder’s new single identity number. 

“We will split the distribution of the E-KTP into two phases,” Raydonnyzar said. 

“The first distribution will be done in 197 districts in early September through the end of December 2011. That will be followed by 300 districts in 2012.” 

He said the distribution of the cards was taking place in two phases to give those districts not yet ready more time to prepare for the program. 

Raydonnyzar said the government had budgeted as much as Rp 5.9 trillion ($690 million) for the E-KPT project. 

He said the new cards would be distributed for free, and that citizens would only need to register at their local subdistrict office to obtain the card. 

It will take about two weeks from registration for the new card to be issued, he said. 

He added that the new cards’ adoption of the Single Identity Number program was also a sign of progress. 

Under the system, all Indonesian citizens will have only one identification number until they die. The government has said the system will lead to greater administrative order and, most important, avoid IDs being duplicated or misused. 

Some terrorists and terrorist suspects have been found carrying multiple identity cards listing falsified information. 

Raydonnyzar said he was confident the E-KTP would also reach those living in remote areas lacking electricity. 

“In order to provide all citizens throughout the country with an E-KTP, we are going to send out officers equipped with laptops and electric generators that will then be used to verify the information of citizens,” he said. “We will also record their fingerprints.” 

He also dismissed rumors that private information would be sold to businesses. 

“The information that the government will sell the citizen database to private institutions is not correct at all,” he said.

One foreign film importer has been cleared to bring movies into Indonesia after reportedly paying the government Rp 9 billion ($1.05 million) in back taxes, but it’s not time for film lovers to rejoice yet. 

Agung Kuswandono, the director general of customs, said on Wednesday that the importer, which was not named, had resumed bringing in foreign titles, raising hopes that the country’s cinemas would soon be flush with Hollywood blockbusters. But these hopes were quickly dashed. 

“The importer whose problem has been solved is an importer of foreign independent films, not an MPAA film importer,” said Syamsul Lussa, the director of films at the Culture and Tourism Ministry, referring to the Motion Pictures Association of America. 

Films from MPAA, which includes Walt Disney Pictures, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film, Universal Pictures and Warner Bros. Entertainment, have not been shown in the country since Feb. 17, when the studios decided that new local import regulations had “a detrimental impact on the cost of bringing a film into Indonesia.” 

Syamsul said talks were continuing over this issue, which centers on how royalties are calculated and charged. “Hopefully, MPAA films can be brought into Indonesia again,” he said. 

The film importer that paid Rp 9 billion in back taxes was one of three that the government said owed a collective Rp 31 billion in unpaid royalties from the past two years. “Those three importers are big ones, they rule 90 to 95 percent of total market,” Agung said, declining to identify the companies. 

According to Widhi Hartono, head of audits at the customs office, all three importers have filed appeals with the tax court against the government demand for them to pay. “But because one of them paid their import duty while the appeal is ongoing, that importer is allowed to import films,” he said. 

Djonny Sjafruddin, the head of the Indonesian Cinema Companies Union (GPBSI), said this should still be greeted as good news. 

“Although they have only been able to bring in second-class foreign films, which cannot really be sold to the market because they are independent American films, this is better than there being no foreign films in Indonesia cinemas,” he said. 

Djonny had earlier said that the foreign film distribution boycott had caused a 60 percent drop in the local cinema industry’s income nationwide. He said theaters had been making do with second-class foreign films and previously run movies as daily screenings are cut. 

Djonny said a company that specialized in non-MPAA films had movies ready to be screened in local cinemas. 

“There are three foreign films that have been imported by Amero Mitra Film and ready to be screened,” he said. “However, we do not know yet whether the audience will like them.” 

Two of the three films, “The Lost Bladesman,” a Hong Kong historical martial-arts film, and “Source Code,” which stars Jake Gyllenhaal and Michelle Monaghan, are now screening in Jakarta cinemas. 

Additional reporting by Dion Bisara

Central Jakarta District Court judges on Wednesday ruled to drop criminal charges against a 14-year-old boy accused of stealing a Rp 10,000 ($1.15) cellphone voucher, saying the investigation into the case was “defective.” 

The move came in the wake of criticisms against the police and prosecutors for bringing a minor to trial over a trivial offense. 

The boy, Deli Suhandi, had spent more than three weeks in an East Jakarta prison with hardened criminals before he was released following pressure from human rights groups and child welfare activists. 

Presiding judge Tjokorda Rai Suamba said the police had violated legal procedures during the investigation. 

“The defendant was not accompanied by a lawyer. Hence, the investigation is deemed to be defective,” Tjokorda said after issuing the preliminary ruling. 

Deli, a junior high student, said that he and two friends from school had only picked up the phone vouchers from the street after rioters destroyed several cellphone shops along Jalan Tanah Tinggi. 

Though investigators said they had a signed letter from Deli stating that he waived his right to a lawyer, the judge said the note should have been signed by the boy’s parents. 

Agam, one of the prosecutors, said on Wednesday that his team would file an appeal against the ruling, saying the police report clearly stated that Deli had refused to be assisted by a lawyer. 

“It is clear in the investigation report that the defendant signed a letter declining an attorney,” he said. “Therefore, we are going to file an appeal.” 

Defense lawyer Hendra Supriatna said if prosecutors failed to appeal within seven days, the case against Deli would be dropped. 

Arist Merdeka Sirait, chairman of the National Commission for Child Protection (Komnas Anak), criticized the Johar Baru Police for locking the boy up, and prosecutors for charging Deli, saying these were in violation of a 2009 joint ministerial decree on dealing with children in conflict with the law. 

“The prosecutor is silly if he wants to file an appeal,” Arist said. “He should have had rejected the case in the first place when the police filed the investigation report.” 

“This kind of case can actually be solved through discussions among the witnesses, the victim and the suspect,” he said. 

“But because there is no evidence and the trial is closed to the public, this case should have been dropped immediately,” the Komnas Anak chairman said. 

Dede Suhandi, Deli’s father, welcomed the court ruling on Wednesday and said he hoped his boy would not be arrested again. 

“I just don’t like the fact that my son has been labeled a criminal,” Dede said. “He has done nothing wrong. The only thing that I want is for my son to be accepted by society.”